NO CLYTMNESTRA, but s.v. Orestes: Leon Golub, ___________.
ÒOrestes.Ó Painting. 1956. Collection of Lori and Alan Crane. [See D. Kuspit, Leon
Golub: existentialist/activist painter (New Brunswick, N.J., 1985) 48, fig.
49. ÒÉIf one uses the perspective of the primitivist/classical dialectic to
compare the various images in the ÔPriestsÕ series (1951 – 1952) with the
later ÔPhilosophersÕ (1957 – 58, as well as with such images of the hero
as Orestes (1956), one observes the same shift from subjectivity to objectivity,
and from the totally disintegrated to the incompletely integrated. GolubÕs
classical figures, especially the armless Orestes, still have massive
primitive wounds, but they have, as it were, accepted them as integral to their
being. É Golub has no doubt swallowed some psychic pride to achieve his
classicism, and his classical figures have lost the glamor of full-fledged
monstrousness, but the result — a calmer sense of self and a firmer grasp
of reality — seems worth it.Ó